Maryland Code & Court Rules,
§11B-111.10. Dispute settlement mechanisms (see also Relevant Documents) reads
In general
(a) Unless the declaration or bylaws state otherwise, the dispute settlement mechanism provided by this section is applicable
to complaints or demands formally arising on or after October 1, 2022.
Procedures required before imposition of fine or infringement of rights
(b)(1) The board of directors or other governing body of the homeowners association may not impose a fine,
suspend voting, or infringe on any other right of a lot owner or any other occupant for violations of rules until the
procedures in this subsection are followed.
(2) A written demand to cease and desist from an alleged violation shall be provided to the alleged violator specifying:
(i) The nature of the alleged violation;
(ii) The action required to abate the violation; and
(iii) A period of time, not less than 15 days, during which the violation may be abated without further sanction, if the violation is a continuing violation, or a statement that any further violation of the same rule may result in the imposition of sanction after notice and opportunity for hearing if the violation is not continuing.
Examination of the declaration and bylaws (see Relevant Documents) reveals no statement
empowering the Board of Directors or other governing body of the homeowners association to impose a fine prior to specifying the alleged violation.
The Thornhill request to pay a $150 fine is in violation of state law. On June 19, 2024 this
observation along with a request to postpone the fine payment until after the alleged violation description becomes available was
emailed to Kathy Quintanal,
a number of Thornhill managers, including George Panos, Thornhill President, as well as
HOA Board of Directors President Kent Bange.